“The annual progress reports of this federal program (some fifteen) had lain dormant for some thirty years until the people began inquiring,” Graves said. “Then Dr. Alan Rabson removed progress reports #14 and progress report #15, representing the years 1977 & 1978.”
“The law requires Dr. Rabson to return all of the confiscated progress reports to the archives. The United States' Constitution says I have a right to life, this federal program proves I do not,” Graves said.
“We continue to seek accountability of the U.S. Special Virus program. Thus far to no avail in any part of our trilateral government. To date over four million people now possess knowledge of the 1971 blueprint of the federal program to make HIV/AIDS.” See also: www.boydgraves.com/flowchart/.
The case was dismissed by Federal Judge Larry A. Burns of the Southern District of California earlier this summer when Graves failed to serve the U.S. Attorney General. However, the record reveals then acting U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales indeed received notice of the lawsuit in May 2007, via certified mail and took no action of his own initiative.
No one in this U.S. government has downloaded the 1971 flowchart nor does any U.S. official have anything to say about U.S. House Resolution 15090, according to Graves. There is a substantial basis in U.S. law and fact for the allegation and the conclusion that the United States intentionally made HIV/AIDS with the purpose for use as a population control weapon; a quiet and silent holocaust of people of color, in the name of future White Americas. Graves cites U.S. Public Law 91-213, signed by then President Richard Nixon March 16, 1970.
“Know the truth about HIV/AIDS and the U.S. Special Virus program,” Graves said. “Then stand up and do something about it!”
####
Posts
4 comments:
In order for your survey to be more honest you must give us the choice of "an accidental or unforseen outcome of a human
experiment."
Look up HB 15090
HB 15090
I don't know if this is true, but I certainly would NOT be shocked given the past goings-on of the government of the USA. What I don't understand is y Dr. Graves doesn't (I certainly haven't seen) show empirical evidence (comparitive blood work) that he has indeed been cured of HIV with the use of injectible Tetrasil. I also think that Dr. Graves' continuous talk of deliberate infection of blacks as opposed to other races does a disservice to obtaining the truth, (if indeed the initial origins was to eliminate blacks) because HIV is a very political issue and the powers-that-are are NOT going to accept/acknowledge/listen, because they know that the (financial, at the very least) implications are mind-staggering. This is one of the reasons y (whether or not one is for or against)the very suggestion of reparations for slavery is viewed as an IMPOSSIBILITY, esp. for the powers-that-are. I know that he has made a few suggestions stating that white homosexuals were also involved, but his main mantra is how blacks were isolated to be eliminated. I can not help but wonder if Graves were to disengage from the race issue and present this as a human issue what the outcome would have been or will be. I speak as a black man who has been living (knowingly) with HIV for 20 years. I appreciate the need to speak about the horrors of racism and eugenics, but I also appreciate timing.
Post a Comment