Monday, December 24, 2007

President Bush named principal in AIDS origin lawsuit


SAN DIEGO - The Ninth Circuit today strengthened the activism of AIDS activist, Boyd Ed Graves, as it named the “Office of the President (George W. Bush) as the principal defendant in the federal appeal. The appeal has been assigned Case No. : 07-56782.

At issue in the Ninth Circuit is whether or not the former attorney general (Gonzales) was ‘served’ in which to allow the lawsuit to go forward.

“On appeal, we will show the former attorney general received the Complaint on
May 17, 2007, long before the lower court’s July dismissal," Graves said.

Court observers believe Graves has an excellent chance on appeal, and the further subsequent disclosure of the U.S. Special Virus Program (1962 – 1978), which many believe is the laboratory birth of AIDS.

The Ninth Circuit has issued the briefing schedule in the case. The whole world is watching.

Additional information on Dr. Graves' court case and judicial activism is posted on his web site


Boyd Ed Graves v. The United States of America, Case No. 07-56782

v. Case No. 07-56782
The United States of America ,

Motion to Prcoeed in forma pauperis
Now comes plaintiff-appellant, Boyd Ed Graves who seeks to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. In support of his motion, plaintiff submits his 9/9/7 motion and declaration to proceed in forma pauperis in the lower court. Exhibit 1, herein. Plaintiff-appellant hereby further asserts with his signature below to the truthfulness and accuracy of his declaration.
Respectfully submitted.

Boyd Ed Graves
574 Garrett Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
I, Boyd Ed Graves do hereby certify that I served a true and complete copy of this Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis, sent via first class mail postage pre paid to:
Office of the President of the United States
George W. Bush, President
c/o Michael Mukasey, Attorney General
United States of America
Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue
Washington, D.C. 20530-0001
Karen P. Hewitt,
U.S. Attorney
880 Front Street
San Diego, Ca 92101-8803
Sent this ____day of December 2007.
Boyd Ed Graves

Sunday, November 11, 2007

Boyd Graves to U.S. Attorny General Mukasey, "U.S. Documents Prove U.S. Origin of AIDS"

Via mail, fax, email

November 10, 2007

The Honorable Michael Mukasey
Attorney General
United States of America
Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue
Washington, D.C. 20530-0001

Case No. 07 cv 0453
Graves v. United States
Southern District of California
(U.S. documents PROVE U.S. ORIGIN of AIDS)

Dear Mr. Attorney General:

I write today to seek a response regarding an ongoing case before the federal government. On May 17, 2007, Attorney General Gonzales received certified mail of the federal complaint, yet the Southern District of California dismissed the case for failure to serve (without prejudice) July 25, 2007.

Upon the filing of the new complaint, the Court “rejected” the complaint without comment. The whitewashing of the U.S. judicial system will never allow this specific case to be heard without your extraordinary intervention.

However, all across the country and the world, this case is being heard. Mr. Attorney General, today, over four million people have the U.S. document evidence proof of the laboratory birth of HIV/AIDS. See,

The Justice Department can no longer have it both ways. There is a substantial basis in U.S. law and fact for the allegation and the conclusion the United States made AIDS.

Chief amongst the evidence:
1. the 1971 blueprint of the program.
The 1971 “research logic” flowchart of the U.S. Special Virus program
is first located at page 61 of progress report #8 (1971). The preceding sixty pages answer every question as to the “purpose”, “desire” and “intent” of the United States to make a “candidate human virus”. Any review of the U.S. Special Virus program and its fifteen progress reports will solve and end HIV/AIDS. Specifically, according to the 1972 report, the United States began testing the AIDS vaccine in 1972.

2. the 1997 CURE for AIDS
Any review of the U.S. Special Virus program will further prove the program is based on a “mouse model” and that a CURE for AIDS was developed in the laboratory mice. See, U.S. patent# 5676977.

3. U.S. House Resolution 15090
The page 129 testimony proves beyond a shadow of a doubt the United States has subrogated the U.S. Constitution. The early files are located in the National Research Council of the National Academy of Sciences. This Congressional funding of AIDS development is consistent with Foreign Policy Statement-21 (“FPS-21”), February 1948. It is also consistent with the 1946 Appropriations, See, “Better” Than the Bomb, Time Magazine, June 3, 1946.

4. U.S. Public Law 91-213
On March 16, 1970, President Nixon handed out pens as he signed the development of HIV/AIDS into law. Even before 15090, Fort Detrick’s April 4 -5 , 1969 conference, “Entry and Control of Foreign Nucleic Acid” led the way. These conference papers will also show the complete criminal culpability of our government to make a silent weapon for a quiet war contrary to the United States Constitution and every world governing authority regarding genocide, weapons of mass destruction and human life. Nixon was clairvoyant, there ‘WERE explosive deaths in the last third of the 20th Century.

5. NSSM-200
At the 1974 World Population Conference in Bucharest, Romania, the African leaders ‘balked’ at the idea of the “introduction” of AIDS (only) in Africa and only to Blacks. The United States agreed to give it to White people here. The United States recruited 1086 White, promiscuous homosexuals and gave them AIDS (the U.S. Special Virus) in batch #751 of Merck’s experimental hepatitis b vaccine. It is alleged the U.S. Department of Justice is illegally withholding this specific information.

6. Nixon’s July 18, 1969 Secret Memo on Overpopulation
This Memo speaks for all the good, innocent citizens who are dead who believed in our Constitution.

7. The sheep (visna) etiology of AIDS
ACCORDING TO THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, HIV/AIDS EVOLVED FROM AN “ICELANDIC” SHEEP DISEASE. See, Science, VOL 227, pp. 173 – 7, January 1985. See also, PROC NAS VOL 83, pp. 4007 – 11, June 1986, PROC NAS Vol 92, pp. 3283 – 3287, April 11, 1995. The Icelandic sheep sequences defy explanation in the genome of HIV/AIDS for a number of reasons. Most noticeable however is the narrative associated from the United States progress reports. On page 39 of progress report #8 (1971), the United States concedes that visna had not yet been associated with human disease. However, on July 18 1983 Dr. Matthew Gonda informed the U.S. AIDS Task Force that HIV/AIDS had evolved from visna. When and how did visna “cross species” between 1971 and 1983 so as to become the ‘etiological agent’ of HIV/AIDS? The issue of reparations revolves around the visna in my blood. A simple oral swab for a human test for visna will determine the reparations issue. If I test affirmative for visna. I should be repaired.

8. The missing progress reports
Dr. Alan Rabson was a member of the “Developmental Committee” of the U.S. Special Virus program and as Deputy Director of the National Cancer Institute, he has removed progress reports #’s 14 and 15 of the U.S. Special Virus program from the NCI archives. Dr. Rabson has been maintained in his position solely to allow the U.S. Special Virus program to fester. His actions are in clear violation of U.S. law.

Mr. Attorney General, we believe there is no more important an issue than one that seeks to buttress the Constitution. We write today to strengthen the security of our homeland, the United States of America, by requesting an investigation into the U.S. Special Virus program (1962 – 1978), its 1971 flowchart and fifteen progress reports, as well as the ten-year on the shelf CURE for AIDS, U.S. patent#5676977. See, .

How long before any apology? Not just to us, but to all the others in the world.

Respectfully submitted,

Boyd Ed Graves, J.D.
Chula Vista, CA 91910

Thursday, October 18, 2007

U.S. District Judge dismisses AIDS Origin lawsuit

SAN DIEGO - The blind hand of 'justice' moved swiftly today dismissing the latest AIDS Origin lawsuit filed by human rights' activist and HIV/AIDS advocate, Dr. Boyd Graves. U.S. District Judge Larry A. Burns threw Dr. Graves litigation out of court without comment today after Dr. Graves refiled last week.

“He (Judge Burns) has certainly violated the federal rules,” Graves said. “He dismissed the complaint prior because of “lack of service” on then U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales; however, he dismissed 'without prejudice.' In essence this federal judge got it both ways.”

Dr. Graves spearheads nearly a decade of litigation dedicated toward exposing the formerly secret U.S. Special Virus Program, a fifteen year covert virus development program that create thousands of liters of new synthetic and chimera type viruses. Dr. Graves and his legion of medical doctors and scientists state HIV/AIDS is the U.S. Special Virus.

“He allows for the continued secrecy of the federal program that made HIV/AIDS and precludes us from further bringing the Freedom of Information Act lawsuit for “full disclosure” of the U.S. Special Virus Program.”

Graves has sued the government several times on this issue from Freedom of Information Act lawsuits for recovering the 'missing' documents to controversial litigation demanding 'make whole relief' reparations for every victim of HIV/AIDS and the U.S. Special Virus Program. Despite today's dismissal, Graves indicates litigation will continue.

Graves has posted the 1971 U.S. Special Virus Research Logic Flow Chart he discovered in 1999 on his web site where he says over 4 million people around the world have now seen the government's formerly secret blueprint for making HIV/AIDS. Graves is the author of two books, “STATE ORIGIN,: The Evidence of the Laboratory Birth of AIDS” and “WORLD WAR AIDS: The Third World War” both books chronicling his fight against HIV/AIDS. The books follow Dr. Graves' important work from the U.S. Supreme Court and the U.S. General Accounting Office investigation to the woodlands of Africa. Dr. Graves continues presenting the evidence of the laboratory birth of AIDS to universities around the country.


Wednesday, October 17, 2007

BOYD GRAVES v. GEORGE W. BUSH The Office of the President of the United States





v. Case No. ______________


The Office of the President of the United States

George W. Bush, President,

And other named and yet named defendants,




NOW COMES, plaintiff, Boyd Ed Graves who re-files the Complaint (enclosed), dismissed without prejudice by Judge Burns. Plaintiff prays the Court will grant his motion to proceed in the forma pauperis and serve defendant, Office of the President of the United States , in the name of the current U.S. Attorney General. It is worthy to note, former U.S. Attorney General, Alberto Gonzales, had been aware of the U.S. Special Virus program and this complaint as is evidenced in the record by his “return receipt” of the May 2007 certified mail.

There is a substantial basis in U.S. law and fact for the allegation and the conclusion my government made HIV/AIDS. Under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), the American people have a right to know. Defendant, Dr. Alan S. Rabson, Deputy Director, National Cancer Institute (NCI”), is not above the law and does not have any authority to remove the missing progress reports from the NCI archives.

Any review of the fifteen progress reports of the U.S. Special Virus (Cancer) program (1962 – 1978) will solve and end HIV/AIDS. It does appear my government began developing an AIDS vaccine as early as 1972. Equally true is the ten year old U.S. CURE for AIDS , U.S. patent #5676977. See,

My actions seek to strengthen the security of my homeland. WHEREFORE; plaintiff prays the Court will grant his motion to proceed in forma pauperis and allow service by the U.S. Marshalls on the named and yet named defendants.

Respectfully submitted,

Boyd Ed Graves, J.D.

574 Garrett Avenue

Chula Vista, Ca 91910


Affected by HIV? You have a case!

Please join the cause and help out.



Tuesday, October 2, 2007

AIDS activist to refile AIDS origin lawsuit

SAN DIEGO - International AIDS Activist, Boyd Ed Graves, J.D. will re-file the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the United States for “full disclosure” of the formerly secret U.S. Special Virus Program (1962 – 1978). According to medical experts, any review of this formerly secret federal virus development program will solve and end HIV/AIDS.

“The annual progress reports of this federal program (some fifteen) had lain dormant for some thirty years until the people began inquiring,” Graves said. “Then Dr. Alan Rabson removed progress reports #14 and progress report #15, representing the years 1977 & 1978.”

“The law requires Dr. Rabson to return all of the confiscated progress reports to the archives. The United States' Constitution says I have a right to life, this federal program proves I do not,” Graves said.

“We continue to seek accountability of the U.S. Special Virus program. Thus far to no avail in any part of our trilateral government. To date over four million people now possess knowledge of the 1971 blueprint of the federal program to make HIV/AIDS.” See also:

The case was dismissed by Federal Judge Larry A. Burns of the Southern District of California earlier this summer when Graves failed to serve the U.S. Attorney General. However, the record reveals then acting U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales indeed received notice of the lawsuit in May 2007, via certified mail and took no action of his own initiative.

No one in this U.S. government has downloaded the 1971 flowchart nor does any U.S. official have anything to say about U.S. House Resolution 15090, according to Graves. There is a substantial basis in U.S. law and fact for the allegation and the conclusion that the United States intentionally made HIV/AIDS with the purpose for use as a population control weapon; a quiet and silent holocaust of people of color, in the name of future White Americas. Graves cites U.S. Public Law 91-213, signed by then President Richard Nixon March 16, 1970.

“Know the truth about HIV/AIDS and the U.S. Special Virus program,” Graves said. “Then stand up and do something about it!”


Tuesday, September 25, 2007

U.S. Govt. silent on pre-AIDS 'Special Virus' flow chart, program

The Special Virus Cancer Program (1962-1977)

Conveniently forgotten by scientists and medical journalists was the fact that surgeons had been transplanting chimpanzee parts into human beings for decades. When Keith Reemtsma died in June 2000, at age 74, he was hailed as a pioneer in cross-species organ transplants (now known as xenotransplantation). By 1964 he had already placed six chimpanzee kidneys into six patients. All his patients died, but eventually Reemtsma succeeded in many successful human-to-human organ transplants.

Much more likely to have spread animal viruses to human beings is the largely forgotten Special Virus Cancer Program (SVCP). This research program was responsible for the development, the seeding, and the deployment of various animal viruses, which were capable of producing cancer and immune system damage when transferred between animal species and into human cells and tissue.
The SVCP began in 1964 as a government-funded program of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) in Bethesda, Maryland. Originally designed to study leukemia and lymphoma forms of cancer, the program was soon enlarged to study all forms of cancer.

The SVCP marshalled many of the nation's finest virologists, biochemists, immunologists, molecular biologists, and epidemiologists, at the most prestigious institutions in a coordinated attempt to assess the role of viruses in causing human cancer. Many of the top AIDS scientists, including Dr. Robert Gallo (the co-discoverer of HIV), Myron (Max) Essex (of "cat AIDS" fame), and Peter Duesberg (who claims HIV is not the cause of AIDS), were connected with the Program.

The scope of the program was international and included scientists from Japan, Sweden, Italy, the Netherlands, Israel, and even Uganda, Africa. A main mission of the SVCP was to collect various human and animal cancers from around the world and to grow large amounts of cancer-causing viruses. In the process, many animal viruses were adapted to human cells. These cultured viruses would then be shipped to researchers throughout the world.

An annual report of the accomplishments of the SVCP was published by the NCI. The 1971 SVCR report indicates a mouse leukemia virus had been adapted to grow in human cells. A "hybrid virus" - a mixture of a mouse sarcoma and a cat (feline) leukemia virus - was engineered and grown in cat cells. Chicken and feline retroviruses produced cancer in monkeys. Mouse-cat virus hybrids and feline leukemia virus were adapted to human cells in tissue culture. Thus, "species jumping" was a common occurrence in these experiments.

Biological Warfare, Primate Research and the SVCP

Also joining forces with the SVCP at the NCI were the miltary's biological warfare researchers. On October 18, 1971, President Richard Nixon announced that the army's biowarfare laboratories at nearby Fort Detrick, Maryland, would be converted to research on the cause, prevention, and treatment of cancer. As part of Nixon's so-called War on Cancer, the military biowarfare unit was retitled the new Frederick Cancer Research Center. Litton Bionetics was named as the military's prime contractor for this project.

The 1971 annual report noted that one of the primary tasks of the now jointly connected National Cancer Institute-Frederick Cancer Research Center was "the large scale production of oncogenic (cancer-causing) and suspected oncogenic viruses to meet research needs on a continuing basis." Special attention was given to primate viruses (the alleged African source of HIV) and "the successful propagation of significant amounts of human candidate viruses."
Candidate viruses were animal or human viruses that might be capable of intiating human cancers. And primate cancer-causing viruses were adapted to 'normal' human cells.

A steady supply of research animals (monkeys, chimpanzees, mice, and cats) was necessary, which resulted in the establishment of breeding colonies for the SVCP. Healthy animals were shipped in from various parts of the world for breeding purposes and experimentation; and virus-infected animals were shipped out again to various labs.

By 1971, a total of 2,274 primates had been inoculated at Bionetics Research Laboratories, under contract to Fort Detrick. Over 1000 of these monkeys had already died or had been transferred to other primate centers. (Some animals were eventually released back into the wild). By this time, experimenters had spread lymphoma-producing viruses into several species of monkeys, and had also isolated a monkey virus (Herpesvirus saimiri) that would have a close genetic relationship to a new Kaposi's sarcoma virus that produced the "gay cancer" of AIDS a few years later.

In order to prime primates and other research animals to acquire cancer, their immune system was deliberately suppressed by drugs, radiation, or cancer-causing chemicals or substances. The thymus gland and/or the spleen was removed, and viruses were injected into newborn animals or into the womb of pregnant animals. Some animals were also injected with malaria to keep them chronically sick and immunodepressed.

Primates (especially newborn and baby chimpanzees) were the most favored lab animals because they were most similar biochemically and immunologically to human beings, and because there would be no official testing of these lab viruses on humans. An irradiated rhesus monkey colony supplied animals for transplantation experiments.

Robert Gallo was a project officer of a primate study contracted by Bionetics that pumped cancerous human tissue, as well as a variety of chicken and monkeys viruses into newborn macaques (a small species of monkey). This 1971 SVCP report (NIH-71-2025) declared: "Inasmuch as tests for the biological activity of candidate human viruses will not be tested in the human species, it is imperative that another system be developed for these determinations and, subsequently for the evaluation of vaccines or other measure of control. The close phylogenetic relationship of the lower primates of man justifies utilization of these animals for these purposes."

Researchers at Bionetics evaluated the long-term cancer effects of injecting human and animal cancer material into various species of monkeys. Newborn monkeys, irradiated monkeys, and monkeys primed with cancer-causing chemicals, were injected with blood ("using multiple sites and volumes as large as possible") taken from various forms of human leukemia. In other studies, tissue cultures infected with various animal viruses were inoculated into primates. Many kinds of human cancer tissue were injected into the animals. How many "new" and "emerging" viruses were created and adapted by the SVCP is not known. And it is unlikely that complete records of this animal cancer virus experimentation will ever be examined.

Cats were also bred for leukemia and sarcoma cancer studies. An inbred germfree colony of mice was established. Mouse cancer viruses were manipulated to produce resistant and non-resistant strains. These adapted viruses would be employed in the 1980s in human gene replacement experiments. Such experiments utilized a weakened strain of the mouse leukemia virus to infect and "taxi-in" the missing genes to genetically-defective human cells.

The End of the SVCP and the Birth of AIDS

By 1977 the SVCP came to a inglorious end. According to Gallo, "Scientifically, the problem was that no one could supply clear evidence of any kind of human tumor virus, not even a DNA virus, and most researchers refused to concede that viruses played any role in human cancers. Politically, the Virus Cancer Program was vulnerable because it attracted a great deal of money and attention and had failed to produce dramatic, visible results."

Despite all this, the SCVP was the birthplace of genetic engineering, molecular biology, and the human genome project. More than any other program it built up the field of animal retrovirology, which led to the vital understanding of cancer and immunosuppressive retroviruses in humans. Like manna from heaven, AIDS in gays put the virologists back in business. And HIV, a cancer-causing and immunosuppressive retrovirus, would make Robert Gallo the most famous scientist in the world.

Few people understand clearly that AIDS is a new form of cancer, and this aspect of AIDS has not been publicized for obvious reasons. Physicians have always told their patients that cancer is not contagious or sexually transmitted. Virologists wanted AIDS and "gay cancer" to be a new disease because HIV was supposedly brand new. It was easier to blame gays for initiating this new disease with their sexual lifestyle than it was to point the finger at scientists. And if AIDS was connected to animal cancer research, some people might wonder if the new disease had anything to do with all those species jumping experiments in the 1970s. Making people understand that AIDS is cancer would only confuse them.

And so, instead of looking for the source of HIV in the thousands of animal cancer experiments performed througout the world, the virologists insisted on looking for the source of the virus in primates in the African rainforest.

The Pre-AIDS Gay Hepatitis B Experiments (1978-1981)

As the SVCP was winding down, thousands of gay men were signing up as guinea pigs for government-sponsored hepatitis B vaccine experiments in New York, Los Angeles, and San Francisco. In a few years these cities would become the epicenters for "gay-related immune deficiency syndrome, " later known as AIDS.

Could virus-contaminated vaccines lie at the root of AIDS? In the early 1970s the hepatitis B vaccine was developed in chimpanzees, now widely accepted as the animal from which HIV supposedly evolved. To this day, some people are fearful about taking the hepatitis B vaccine because of its original connection to gay men and AIDS; and older physicians remember the original experimental hepatitis vaccine was made from the pooled blood serum of hepatitis-infected homosexuals.

Was HIV "introduced" into gays during these vaccine trials when thousands of homosexuals were injected in New York beginning in 1978, and in the West Coast cities in 1980-1981?

AIDS first erupted in gays living in New York City in 1979 a few months after the experiment began in Manhattan. The astounding and statistically significant fact is that 20% of the gay men who volunteered for the hepatitis B experiment in New York were discovered to be HIV-positive in 1980 (a year before AIDS became "official" in 1981). This would mean that Manhattan men had the highest incidence of HIV anywhere in the world, including Africa, the supposed birthplace of HIV and AIDS. The fact is that definite, proven cases of AIDS in Africa would not appear until 1982.

Some researchers are convinced that these vaccine experiments served as the vehicle through which HIV was "introduced" into the gay population in America. Nevertheless, AIDS scientists have downplayed any connection of AIDS with the vaccine. My own extensive research into the hepatitis B experiments is presented in AIDS and the Doctors of Death: An Inquiry into the Origin of the AIDS Epidemic, published in 1988. Also included in this book is evidence suggesting "patient
Zero" story of 1987, which claimed a promiscuous gay Canadian airline steward brought AIDS to America. Montagnier "is doubtful that the American epidemic could have developed from a single patient."

Montagnier admits that he stands apart from Robert Gallo on many matters. In a mind-blowing statement he declares "Gallo was not a medical doctor, but rather a biochemist by training. His limited experience with viruses at the time perhaps explains his misinterpretations and the contaminations that occurred in his laboratory." ( Gallo has always declared himself as a physician. If he is not, then we certainly do have a conspiracy problem on our hands.)

What is obvious from their authored books is that while the continent of Africa dies, these two top scientists in AIDS research continue their vendetta in print, and continue to promote their own pet theories on the origin of HIV and AIDS to an adoring scientific community.

"Gay and Straight" Strains of HIV and Sexual Preference

It is common knowledge that AIDS is a heterosexual disease in Africa, and that AIDS started exclusively as a gay disease in the United States. Although the public was told early on that "no one is immune from AIDS", the fact remains that even now (20 years after the first AIDS cases) 80% of the new AIDS cases in America are gay men, IV drug addicts, and their sexual partners. Why is this? Certainly HIV does not discriminate between sexual preference and race! Or does it?

In the mid-1990s molecular biologists identified at least 8 different subtypes (or "clades" or "strains") of HIV that were infecting various people around the world. Remarkably, it turns out that the "B" strain is the predominant strain infecting gays in the U.S. Even more remarkable is that this strain of HIV has an "affinity" to infect rectal tissue, thus explaining why gays are more likely to get AIDS than straights. In contrast, the HIV strains common in Africa have an affinity for vaginal and cervical cells, as well as for cells of the foreskin of the penis. Thus, HIV is more likely to infect heterosexuals in Africa.

How do we know this? Max Essex (a Harvard veterinarian who performed pre-AIDS experiments transferring feline leukemia virus between cat populations) tested subtype E strains of HIV from Thailand. He discovered that this Asian strain readily infected women's genital cells of the vagina and cervix. But the "gay" B strain of HIV did not infect them as easily.

AIDS experts tell us American AIDS came from Africa, but the strain of HIV prevalent in gay men is almost never seen in Africa! How is this possible? Were strains of HIV engineered to adapt easily to cells likely to be infected in gay sex? Or adapted to genital cells involved in vaginal sex?

We know scientists in the SVCP were able to adapt certain retroviruses to infect specific kinds of cells. As early as 1970 biowarfare scientists were learning to design certain infectious agents (particularly viruses) that would attack the cells of certain racial groups.
More recently, in 1997, Stephen O'Brien and Michael Dean of the Laboratory of Genomic Diversity at the National Cancer Institute have shown that one out of ten white people have AIDS-resistant genes, whereas blacks in Africa have none. Is this simply another peculiarity of a virus that jumped species in the African bush? Or is HIV a designer virus, specifically adapted in its subtypes to infect certain racial groups and gay people?

When AIDS appeared in 1981, health officials assured the "general public" that there was nothing to fear. "AIDS is a gay disease" was the phrase repeated over and over again in a media blitz. As late as 1987, Robert Gallo told Playboy reporter David Black, "I personally don't know of a single case (in America) of a man getting the (AIDS) virus from a woman through heterosexual intercourse."

In Africa, where AIDS affects men and women in equal numbers, Gallo's explanation to Black was: "It happens, but that may be due to differences in sexual practices, more promiscuity or to a greater incidence of venereal disease." Gallo give Playboy his reassurance of the future of heterosexual AIDS in America: "AIDS will never become an overwhelming danger to the general public."

Solving the Mystery of the Origin of AIDS

The pre-AIDS species jumping experiments of the Special Virus Cancer Program (SVCP) have been largely expunged from the history of HIV and AIDS. The viral contamination problems inherent in viral research have also been downplayed. As a result, the origin of HIV and AIDS has been distorted and obscured.

A serious examination of the SVCP provides "missing links" to the possible laboratory origin of HIV. The ability of SVCP scientists to produce "new" diseases with cancer-causing animal viruses is a matter of record. The ability of animal viruses to easily contaminate laboratory experiments and vaccine manufacture is also well known. All these factors make the man-made theory of AIDS rational and compelling.

| DOWNLOAD | The 1971 U.S. Special Virus Research Logic Flow Chart

Tuesday, September 11, 2007

The U.S. ORIGIN of HIV/AIDS: Before and After 9-11

September 10, 2007

Before and After 9-11

ANYONE who reads the response[1] to the June 2002 GAO ORIGIN of AIDS Report will clearly see the issue of the ORIGIN of HIV/AIDS was percolating at the same time when 9-11 occurred. The problem then was my Congressman, Congressman James Traficant. He had violated several U.S. House rules and was facing a prison sentence, where he currently is.

9-11 placed 100 million tons of demolition on the solid evidence of U.S. documents which prove the laboratory birth of HIV/AIDS. As it was then, it is now, if we review and investigate the U.S. Special Virus Cancer program (1962 – 1978), we will solve and end HIV/AIDS.

However, beginning in July 2001, Congressman Traficant was intently interested in the U.S. ORIGIN of HIV/AIDS. As the response shows (footnote 1), initially, the Congressman’s staff was very interested and in fact, eager to proceed with getting an explanation for a federal virus development program that spent $550 million dollars of taxpayer money to create HIV/AIDS[2]. But after 9-11, the Congressman’s staff was distant and hostile. In fact after the GAO report came out, I was instructed to not contact the Congressman’s office again. This was the same response from the Ohio Senators (Voinovich and DeWine).
Although the GAO ORIGIN of the AIDS Virus report is seriously purposefully flawed, it provides incredible insights as to the depth this government will go to hide its criminal behavior.

All my life I thought I had an inalienable right to life, the U.S. Special Virus program proves I do not. Beginning in May 2000, the government was alerted the people had found the 1971 “research logic” flowchart
[3]. In a May 15, 2000 letter, Dr. Victoria Cargill, Medical Officer for the Office of AIDS Research, National Institutes of Health (NIH) located the 1971 flowchart of the development of HIV/AIDS in the archives of the National Cancer Institute (NCI). She forwarded the information to Dr. Alan S. Rabson, Deputy Director, NCI.

Dr. Rabson was a member of the Developmental Committee of the Special Virus program[4], and has a vested interest in the truth not being known. Dr. Rabson removed progress reports #14 and 15 from the NCI archives in an effort to thwart any investigation into the secret virus development program. Dr. Rabson also informed the GAO their June 2002 report is accurate.

What we see here is a total subterfuge of the U.S. Constitution. I have never had a right to life. There is a ‘curtain’ surrounding the issue of the ORIGIN of HIV/AIDS. The curtain manifests itself in the fifteen progress reports of this secret program. Since 9-11 there has been tremendous hesitancy on the part of U.S. officials to address the call for review of this federal virus development program. The reason is: ALL roads lead to the early 20th Century U.S. eugenics program that birthed Adolph Hitler.

Although Hitler died, his racist, biological scientists all came to the United States and worked with prominent U.S. scientists, like Dr. Garth Nicolson[5] under Project Paperclip. However, it is the visna virus that wreaks of racism in the highest order. HIV/AIDS is associated with a 1932 strain of visna virus, strain ks-1514[6]. Remember, the syphilis experiments on African Americans began that year also.

Hitler sent 20 sheep to the island of Iceland , with two sheep carrying the visna disease. The sheep were spread out around the island and the genociders sat back and watched. What they found was, in six years, the herds in the company of the two sheep carrying visna virus were all dead. When they released HIV/AIDS @ 1978, they waited six years to announce they knew what the mystery illness was (April 1984). But upon closer examination, we find that Dr. Robert Gallo filed a patent for his intellectual property to ‘continuously produce HIV/AIDS[7].

We are certain 9-11 has not been properly placed in the total scheme of things. We are also certain, beyond any shadow of a doubt, the United States has developed the cure and vaccine for HIV/AIDS[8].
This 9-11 rekindle the fire for truth. We have addressed the smoke to long. Please download the 1971 flowchart. If we review the U.S. Special Virus program, we will solve and end HIV/AIDS. However, it is looking more and more as if people want stealth federal killings programs.

Six years ago, the American people and truth were pulverized. Yet, the truth continues to creep forward. We will garner a review of the federal program that made HIV/AIDS at some point. I wish we didn’t have to wait another six years. We are hopeful the AIDS review will be a part of the next Presidential administration. But, looking at the level of complexity of the U.S. government (to pull off a 9-11) it is doubtful this issue will ever see the light of day.

“We have found the wellspring of the genesis of HIV/AIDS, it is our nation state, it is u.s.”

Boyd Ed Graves, J.D.

[2] See page 5, progress report# 15 (1978), U.S. Special Virus program (1962 – 1978)
[4] See, page 12, progress report #8 (1971)
[5] See, Chapter Excerpt,
[6] See, Science, Vol 227, pp. 173 – 7, January 1985
[7] See, patent#4647773
[8] See , U.S. patent#5676977, see also Leukemia/lymphoma vaccine, University of Texas , 1972

Friday, August 17, 2007

A Solution to the AIDS Crisis

August 16, 2007

Nancy Pelosi, Speaker
House of Representatives
United States Congress
Washington, D.C. 20530

Re: A Solution to the AIDS Crisis

Dear Madam Speaker:

First let me say thank you for allowing your staff to contact me regarding the issue of the ORIGIN, VACCINE and CURE for HIV/AIDS.

Any review of the U.S. Special Virus (Cancer) program (1962 – 1978) will solve HIV/AIDS. According to page 2 of the 1971 progress report (#8), the purpose of the U.S. Special Virus program was to see if animal viruses (visna) could grow in certain human host cells. The 1971 progress report confirms visna had not yet been associated with human disease. See page 39.

At the July 18, 1983 AIDS Task Force meeting, Dr. Matthew A. Gonda confirmed that visna (not SIV) was the “etiological agent” of HIV/AIDS. Dr. Gonda then co-authored a science paper with Dr. Robert Gallo to further show the evolutionary relationship between HIV/AIDS and visna. See, Science, Vol 227, pp. 173 – 7, January, 1985.

In 1986, the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) reached the same conclusion. See, PROC NAS Vol 83, pp. 4007 – 11, June 1986. Further, in 1995, the NAS concluded that (because of the visna origin of HIV/AIDS), sheep were the best animal model for the testing of new HIV/AIDS inhibitors. See, PROC NAS Vol 92, pp. 3283 – 87, April 1995.

The sheep sequences in HIV/AIDS alone prove HIV/AIDS is the product of recombinant genetics. Otherwise, the United States would be able to cite a reference to the “cross species transfer” of visna into the human genome. There is none.

The visna virus has been nurtured over the past 75 years for the purposes of accomplishing a hidden eugenics plan of depopulation of people of color. The fifteen progress reports of the U.S. Special Virus program are filled with experiments and contracts on visna.

When this issue was previously presented to the government, prior to 9-11, the government found it convenient to postpone their report until June 2002. However, the report (below) was fraught with falsities for obvious reasons. The government did not respond to the people’s “Request for Factual Correction” (below).

Today, more than four million people have the 1971 flowchart blueprint of the Special Virus program. It proves that HIV/AIDS was designed and intended to be afflicted on the people. See,
However, Phase IV-A holds the keys to some of the early work done to control and inhibit HIV/AIDS, including a 1972 VACCINE for HIV/AIDS.
As we have also pointed out, the government patented the CURE for AIDS in 1997. See , U.S. patent#5676977, .

U.S. House Resolution 15090, page 129 proves the U.S. Congress has consistently funded the continual development of HIV/AIDS in contradiction to the U.S. Constitution.

Madam Speaker, do I have an inalienable right to life or not?

Respectfully submitted,

Boyd Ed Graves, J.D.
574 Garrett Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910

Friday, July 20, 2007

U.S. Attorney General Gonzales to answer AIDS origin lawsuit

SAN DIEGO - Federal Court Judge Larry Burns has issued an Order giving AIDS activist Boyd Ed Graves until July 27, 2007 to 'show cause' as to why his complaint should not be dismissed. At issue is Graves’ failure to ‘summon’ the United States Attorney General, Alberto Gonzales.

“When I filed the case on March 12, 2007 there was a waiver of summons form that I was unfamiliar with,” Graves said. Consequently Gonzales never received a ‘summons’ for the federal lawsuit.

However on May 12, 2007 Graves sent Attorney General Gonzales the federal lawsuit via certified mail, return receipt requested. On May 15, 2007 Attorney General Gonzales received the federal lawsuit as the return receipt reflects.

Graves will submit the proof of service by the Court’s identified deadline and will await an answer from the U.S. Attorney General.

The Attorney General will not be able to explain why Dr. Alan Rabson, Deputy Director National Cancer Institute (NCI) has removed government documents form the archives of the NCI,” Graves said.

However to many observers familiar with Graves' case, this lawsuit will show the true conspiratorial nature of the United States to make HIV/AIDS and then rely on an abridged press and twisted judicial process to further hide the truth of the laboratory birth of HIV/AIDS, inside the formerly secret U.S. Special Virus Program (1962-1978).

Anyone who reviews the docket will see the African American Federal Judge Nathaniel Jones, had recused himself from Graves’ lawsuit on March 22, 2007 without explanation.

Dr. Boyd Ed Graves has developed a global following of his 15 years of HIV/AIDS ORIGIN research and his nine years of legal activism to compel the United States to admit the truths identified in the government documents.

If we review the fifteen progress reports of the U.S. Special Virus program (1962 – 1978), we will solve and end HIV/AIDS. It is appalling we find all three level of government assisting the process to subrogate the U.S. Constitution. The U.S. Special Virus program PROVES, I have never had a right to life.”


Sunday, July 8, 2007

An Appeal to the National Medical Association on the issue of solving HIV/AIDS

July 8, 2007

Dear President Pinn-Wiggins:

There is clear and convincing evidence a federal virus program preceded the onset of HIV/AIDS. We believe the NMA has an obligation to all Americans to review and investigate the U.S. Special Virus program (1962 – 1978).

According to the many physicians, this is the federal program at the genesis of HIV/AIDS. See, There are fifteen progress reports of the development of HIV/AIDS detailing every experiment and contract. A review of the 1971 report ( progress report # 8) reveals a “research logic” blueprint for the development of HIV/AIDS. See page 61. In addition, on page 2, the U.S. narrative reveals the purpose of this federal program. This federal program was established to see if animal viruses ( like visna sheep disease) could grow in human cells.

According to Dr. Matthew A. Gonda and Dr. Robert Gallo, HIV/AIDS ‘evolved’ from visna. See, Science, Vol. 227, pp. 173 – 177. January 1985. See also, PROC NAS Vol. 83, pp. 4007 – 11, June 1986.

Any review of this federal program will definitively solve HIV/AIDS. Equally true, also, if we begin the clinical trials of the U.S. patented CURE for AIDS, U.S. patent #5676977, we will rapidly be able to determine if we have found a supplemental treatment to assist people with HIV/AIDS.

As the physician leaders of the African American race, we ask that you undertake a formal review of the U.S. Special Virus program and the ten year old patented CURE for HIV/AIDS that has been merely sitting on the shelf. We are hopeful the NMA will recommit itself to the African American patient.

We have within our reach a vision of a world once again without HIV/AIDS, we believe your organization has a major part to play in restoring the lives of Americans afflicted with the synthetic HIV/AIDS.

Freedom’s slave,

Boyd Ed Graves, J.D.
574 Garrett Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910

cc: Congresswoman Donna Christen Christensen
Congressional Black Caucus
(Health Brain Trust)

Heleyne Gayle
International AIDS Society

Minister Louis Farakhan
Nation of Islam

Wednesday, July 4, 2007

Wednesday, June 13, 2007

Hope in clinical trials of AIDS Cure

June 12, 2007

Senator Russell Feingold,
Chairman Subcommittee on Africa

Re: Hope in clinical trials of AIDS Cure

Dear Chairman Feingold:

I write today to report on my recent trip to Africa. At the invitation of a Zambian businessman, I traveled to Lusaka last month for the purposes of convincing the Zambian government to begin the ‘clinical trials’ of the U.S. patented CURE for AIDS, U.S. patent number 5676977 (“TETRASIL”). Go to

According to the U.S. patent office, Tetrasil is a one-time infusion for curing AIDS. As a recipient of the Tetrasil myself, I can personally attest to the many benefits that I have garnered over the past six years.

As Chairman of the African Committee I feel compelled to alert you of the African desire to be free of the U.S. AIDS virus. In this regard, your Committee has never addressed the federal virus development program that preceded HIV/AIDS. Although the U.S. development of HIV/AIDS permeates the entire 20th Century, the formal program began in 1962. The U.S. Special Virus program produced some fifteen yearly progress reports of every experiment and contract of the development of HIV/AIDS between 1962 and 1978.

It is incumbent upon your Committee to review and investigate this federal program. This is the same request we made of our government in 2000. Dr. Victoria Cargill, NIH’s Medical Officer for HIV/AIDS Research located the blueprint ( a 1971 flowchart) of the development of HIV/AIDS on May 15, 2000. Dr. Cargill forwarded the information to Dr. Alan S. Rabson, Deputy Director of the National Cancer Institute (NCI).

Dr. Rabson thwarted any further investigation of the U.S. Special Virus program because he is listed as a member of the “Developmental Segment” (of HIV/AIDS) in 1971. See, page 12, progress report #8 (1971), U.S. Special Virus program (1962 – 1978).

It is clear without oversight from this Committee and your leadership, there will always remain, even perhaps, purposefully so, some doubt that a monkey and an African could have been a ‘natural’ beginning to the greatest calamity in human history.

In light of the fifteen progress reports of this federal program, we are certain the African governments will require ‘explanation’ for the HIV/AIDS weapon. Any cursory review of the U.S. Pentagon’s sworn testimony of June 9, 1969 will definitively prove HIV/AIDS is the ‘synthetic biological agent’ sought by the U.S. Pentagon and paid for by the U.S. Congress.

I can assure the African governments have read page 129 of U.S. House Resolution 15090. Our President was factually incorrect when he declared in his 2003 State of the Union Address that HIV/AIDS was a plague of nature.

Mr. Chairman, if HIV/AIDS is a plague of nature, then where is the Pentagon’s synthetic agent, that was funded, that appears to do EXACTLY what HIV/AIDS does?


Boyd Ed Graves, J.D.

Tuesday, June 5, 2007

Voice of America violates U.S. Law (May 29, 2007)

May 29, 2007

To the Voice of America
Re: Violation of U.S. Public Law 94-350;
Your Zambia AIDS CURE broadcast

To Whom it may concern:

The May 27 Internet stream of the Zambian AIDS CURE contains a heading of “Zamiba (sp) Fake Drugs”. The VOA has violated its charter and mission pursuant to U.S. law.

The VOA has violated U.S. Public law 94-350 in that the broadcast has clearly attempted to discredit the U.S. patented CURE for AIDS, “Tetrasil” as a “fake”. The Voice of America can not replace the modality of the clinical trials, however with its purposefully false pronouncement, the VOA has illegally sought to sway public opinion away from the U.S. patented CURE for AIDS.

The VOA violates its charter and the American people and the 100 million people of the world who depend on it for initial “objectivity”, when it refers to a U.S. patented product as ‘fake’ without any conclusionary evidence.

In this particular complaint, the VOA chose to label Tetrasil as fake, although the clinical trials are just getting underway and Zambian officials have not come to that same conclusion, and in essence hold out for the results of the trials. The VOA does not have a right to take away the hope of the people by intentionally false broadcasts.

Here, by purpose and intent, the VOA has sought to supercede the comprehensive clinical trial process to draw an inaccurate portrayal of a CURE for AIDS, that has already gone through comprehensive testing and been proven. The VOA has intentionally made a clear and effective attempt to draw public attention and interest away from a grass roots process that is truth and people driven.

Tetrasil is not fake, it is cheap and effective, and as the patent shows, it is not a drug. I would appreciate a public retraction of your heading and your global attention on the trials.


Boyd Ed Graves, J.D.

I believe the children are our future...

Freedom is a constant struggle

Dr. Graves to U.S. Ambassador Carmen Martinez - May 28, 2007

Dear Ambassador Martinez,

I write today to follow your Freedom Day remarks. I am here in Zambia because I too believe in the expressed political values that you espouse of freedom relative to press and government accountability. With respect to this issue of the Origin of AIDS, the President has made specific remarks, and they are not true.

In the President’s 2003 State of the Union Address, he informed the world that AIDS was a plague of nature’. In subsequent comments, the President said that his comments had been approved by the Central Intelligence Agency.

The historical development of HIV/AIDS is best explained through any review of CIA Project NAOMI. This CIA program appears to be the underpinnings of the implementation of HIV/AIDS, following the 1946 confirmation of the development of HIV/AIDS, as in evidenced in the May 1946 Appropriations hearing of the Uned States Congress.

Going further, as we must, we find a sleugh of U.S. Congressional documentation, unquestionable, as to there purpose and intent. In this regard, it is the 1969 Pentagon request for a ‘synthetic biological agent’ that could deplete the immune system’ that has stood and will stand as the single most compelling piece of evidence against our government for all time.

U.S. House Resolution 15090, page 129 and its global read, is the essence of the principles of freedom of which you speak Page 129 is clear and plain and all can understand, in every language. The conclusion is real and frightening, but true. HIV/AIDS is the synthetic agent sought by our government since, at least, the 1843 discovery of ‘mycoplasmas’. But for the U.S. Special Virus program (1962 – 1978), science and medicine can not explain the sheep recombinant sequences in the genome of HIV/AIDS.

Dr. Robert Gallo is guilty, but not as charged. By his own admission, he was a “Project Officer” for the U.S. Special Virus program. See, page 104, progress report #8 (1971), U.S. Special Virus program (1962 -1978). Dr. Gallo congratulated me for confirming page 157 of his autobiography.

In addition, the U.S. CURE for AIDS was patented by Dr. Gallo’s medical school classmate, Rabbi Dr. Marvin Antelman. In 1997, our government issued Rabbi Antelman a patent for a treatment for curing AIDS. See, U.S. patent #5676977. I am here in Lusaka to begin to end the U.S. AIDS virus. We have within our reach a vision of a world once again free of HIV/AIDS. I trust, hope and pray you genuinely share in this regard.

Freedom’s slave,

Boyd Ed Graves, J.D.

Dr. Graves presenting the U.S. Special Virus logo to a leadership conference in Lusaka, Zambia Jun2 1, 2007