Showing posts with label hiv. Show all posts
Showing posts with label hiv. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 8, 2008

U.S. Supreme Court gives Boyd Graves 60 days

September 29, 2008


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE


U.S. Supreme Court provides Boyd Graves 60 days

San Diego - On Saturday, September 27, 2008, Boyd Ed Graves, J.D. received a letter from the Clerk of the U. S. Supreme Court informing him he had sixty days to correct procedural requirements of the Court, and his case may be heard.

“I am elated the American people have a further opportunity to seek accountability of the U.S. Special Virus program (1962 – 1978),” Graves said. “Once this federal program is fully disclosed the world will clearly see the man made etiology of HIV/AIDS; and will have a direct path to resolve the greatest human calamity in the history of the world.”

Court observers believe the narrow question (of service on the former U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales) may provide a chance for the high court to hear his case.

“With respect to the service issue, the American people can show the (former) U.S. Attorney General (Gonzales), received ‘service’ on May 15, 2007,” Graves said. “Thus our country’s top law enforcement officer has been aware of the federal program that made AIDS, and has taken no action of his own accord.”

“The American people are entitled to know the truth about this formerly secret federal virus development program that preceded HIV/AIDS and ended just as HIV/AIDS began," Graves said. “Any review of the U.S. Special Virus program (1962 – 1978) will solve and end AIDS.”

“We have within our reach, a vision of a world once again without HIV/AIDS, we must not fail.”

American Boyd Ed Graves is a vocal human rights activist and AIDS victims' advocate whose 2001 appeal to the United States' Supreme Court for 'full disclosure' of the U.S. Special Virus Program was rejected eight years ago without comment by the nation's highest court. Now U.S. Supreme Court Case 00-9587 is in large part the topic of Dr. Graves' first book on the medical global AIDS cover-up entitled, "STATE ORIGIN: The Evidence of the Laboratory Birth of AIDS" (2001 Zygote Media).

####

Thursday, May 1, 2008

Federal Court dismisses AIDS orgin lawsuit

April 29, 2008
NINTH CIRCUIT DISMISSES AIDS ORIGIN “FULL DISCLOSURE” LAWSUIT

San Fransisco, Calif. - In a not so unexpected move the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco dismissed the AIDS ORIGIN appeal of AIDS and Human Rights Activist, Boyd Ed Graves, J.D. The Court held that Graves failed to properly serve the former U.S. Attorney General and that the District Court had a right to refuse a new case, although the lower court dismissed the original complaint without prejudice.


“We will file another Freedom of Information Act request with the National Cancer Institute (NCI) for the missing progress reports of the U.S. Special Virus program (1962 – 1978)," Graves said earlier today.

“Progress Reports #’s 14 and 15, representing the years 1977 and ’78 have been removed by Deputy Director, Dr. Alan Rabson, who is also listed as a ‘developer’ of HIV/AIDS (the Special Virus)," Graves said.


Progress reports #’s 14 and 15 represent the ‘end reports’ of a federally funded virus development program that ended just as HIV/AIDS began. According to the experts, any review of the U.S. Special Virus program will solve and end AIDS. See, www.boydgraves.com/comments/.
####

Wednesday, March 19, 2008

Ninth Circuit poised to dispel indigent AIDS petitioner

March 19, 2008
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT: Boyd Ed Graves, J.D.
619-849-9364 www.boydgraves.com
Graves v. U.S.A. Case No. 07-056782
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals


Ninth Circuit (Goliath) poised to dispel indigent AIDS petitioner


(San Francisco, CA.) In a March 14, 2008 Order, a three-Judge panel of the Ninth Circuit in San Francisco has ruled that AIDS activist, Boyd Ed Graves, J.D., must pay the excessive $455 filing fee and “show cause” as to why the lower court’s decision should not be summarily affirmed.

What is troubling in this case is that Graves has filed his ‘opening brief’ with the Court as of February 6, 2008. In order for the ‘show cause’ order to have significance, it should have been filed prior to submission of Graves’ February brief, observers believe.

A review of the relevant Court rule (9th Cir. R. 3-6) further provides that Graves’ February brief, supersedes the requirement to show cause and that Graves should merely have to pay the filing fee within the 21 day period (of March 14th) as prescribed by the Court.

“Although the three-Judge panel overlooked the opening brief filed with the Court in February, it is not peculiar to see this ‘extraordinary’ attempt by the judiciary to further snuff the U.S. documents concluding a laboratory birth of HIV/AIDS,” Graves said.


“Any one who knows me, knows that I have continuously pursued my Constitutional right to life,” Graves said. “My actions seek to strengthen the security of my homeland, the United States of America."


Court observers believe that upon the paying of the filing fee, the briefing schedule will be restored. The brief of the U.S. Attorney General is due April 21, 2008.
####

Tuesday, March 11, 2008

FDA DEAD wrong about Tetrasil

via email

Re: FDA Warns Companies Importing and Marketing Drugs Over the Internet that Fraudulently Claim to Prevent and Treat STDs

Dear Ms. Chappelle:

The FDA can not simply have it both ways. The 1997 government patent on tetrasil speaks for itself. The FDA is merely standing in the way of restoring the health of millions and millions of people, mostly of color. To date, the FDA has never addressed the U.S. Special (Cancer) Virus program (1962 – 1978).

To date, the FDA has never addressed the visna sheep sequences in the blood of people with HIV/AIDS. See, PROC NAS Vol. 83, pp. 4007 – 11, June 1986. See also, PROC NAS Vol. 92, pp. 3283 – 3287, April 11, 1995.

The current 2008 “Understanding HIV and AIDS” poster is identical to the virus created in the Special Virus program. See, Nature New Biology, Vol. 232, pp. 140 – 2, 1971.

The U.S. patent below deserves “immediate scrutiny” from the FDA, not tomorrow, today.

Boyd Ed Graves, J.D.
www.boydgraves.com
619-849-9364
------

FDA Warns Companies Importing and Marketing Drugs Over the Internet that Fraudulently Claim to Prevent and Treat STDs

FDA News

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
March 6, 2008


Media Inquiries:
Rita Chappelle, 301-827-6242
Consumer Inquiries:
888-INFO-FDA

FDA Warns Companies Importing and Marketing Drugs Over the Internet that Fraudulently Claim to Prevent and Treat STDs


The U.S. Food and Drug Administration today issued Warning Letters to six U.S. companies and one foreign individual for marketing unapproved and misbranded drugs over the Internet to U.S. consumers for the prevention and treatment of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs).

Some of these products, directed at U.S. consumers, falsely claim to have "FDA Approval" and some claim to be "more effective" than conventional medicine. The products are sold as Tetrasil, Genisil, Aviralex, OXi-MED, Imulux, Beta-mannan, Micronutrient, Qina, and SlicPlus. Consumers who are currently using these products should stop their use immediately and consult their health care professional if they have experienced any adverse effects that they suspect are related to the use of any of these products.

"The products pose a serious health threat to unsuspecting consumers who don’t know that these products are not FDA approved and have not been proven safe or effective," said Janet Woodcock, M.D., deputy commissioner for scientific and medical programs, chief medical officer, and acting director of the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. "STDs are very serious diseases and these products give consumers a false sense of security that they are protected from STDs."

The products claim to prevent or treat a variety of STDs, including Herpes, Chlamydia, Human Papilloma Virus, cervical dysplasia, and HIV/AIDS. The FDA considers these U.S. and imported products to be unapproved new drugs being marketed in violation of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act. They are also misbranded under the law because they lack proper directions for use by consumers. In addition, some of the products are misbranded because they make false and misleading claims.

Examples of claims that these products make include "Treatment Kills all Herpes Viruses WITHOUT having to use conventional drugs or medications," "Greatest STD Protection Without Condoms," (SlicPlus) and "The active ingredient in our product is FDA certified to destroy 99.9992 percent of all pathogenic organisms [ie] Chlamydia" (OXi-MED).

The Warning Letters inform the companies that failure to properly resolve violations of the law may cause them to face further enforcement action that can include seizure of illegal products, injunction, and possible criminal prosecution.

Issuing these Warning Letters is part of the FDA’s ongoing campaign against fraudulent products marketed on the Internet for serious and life-threatening diseases. The agency also works to educate consumers about the risks and dangers that exist from buying unsafe products.

Consumers and health care professionals should notify the FDA of any complaints or problems associated with these products. These reports may be made to MedWatch, the FDA’s voluntary reporting program, by calling 800-FDA-1088, or electronically at www.fda.gov/medwatch/report.htm.

To view the letters,
http://www.fda.gov/foi/warning_letters/s6680c.htm - Aviralex Int.

http://www.fda.gov/foi/warning_letters/s6681c.htm - Aidance Skincare

http://www.fda.gov/foi/warning_letters/s6682c.htm - Health-science-report

http://www.fda.gov/foi/warning_letters/s6683c.htm - NeumaLife

http://www.fda.gov/foi/warning_letters/s6684c.htm - IMULUX, LLC

http://www.fda.gov/foi/warning_letters/s6685c.htm - Saferex Laboratories

http://www.fda.gov/foi/warning_letters/s6686c.htm - McKinnon, Blair

#

Friday, February 1, 2008

A Challenge to Dr. Robert Gallo to Debate the ORIGIN of AIDS

January 19, 2008
A Challenge to Dr. Robert Gallo to Debate the ORIGIN of AIDS
Northern Illinois University
Center for Black Studies,
February 7, 2008, 7p.m.
Dear Bob:
Please give me a return call to see if you can join me for a debate on the “ORIGIN of AIDS” to be held at Northern Illinois University on February 7, 2008. You may recall we have previously spoken on this issue and you have given conflicting answers, perhaps understandably so. However, on 60 MINUTES you stated that “monkeys” were the best bet for the origin of HIV/AIDS, in the sense that they do bite (Africans). In contrast, however, you conclude in your autobiography that “sheep” are the etiological origin of HIV/AIDS. See, page 157.
The question is: “When did visna cross species”? You conclude in your 1985 science article that HIV/AIDS evolved from an “Icelandic sheep disease” (visna). See, Science Vol. 227, pp. 173 – 7, January 1985. You also provide electron microscopes to show the ‘identical nature’ of HIV and visna. Since visna has been around since Tuskegee ( 1932), how could HIV have been a mystery to you?
Please give me a call and try to join me in debate on this most important matter. Your empty podium will be reflective of the truth about the U.S. Special Virus program (1962 – 1978). According to the fifteen progress reports of this secret federal virus development program, you were a “Project Officer”. See, page 104, progress report #8 (1971) U.S. Special Virus program. In this capacity you isolated a human retrovirus (the esp-1 virus) and reported it on page 335 as paper #650, “Reverse Transcriptase of Type C Virus Particles of Human Origin”. See, Nature New Biology, Vol. 232, pp. 140 – 4, 1971.
Your 1971 electron microscope of the esp-1 virus is identical to your 1985 electron microscope of HIV/AIDS. Also, the current government anatomical poster, “Understanding HIV and AIDS” is equally, frighteningly similar.
The sheep sequences in HIV ALONE prove HIV/AIDS did not come from monkeys and Africans, but from the recombinant laboratories of the United States , under your leadership. I await your call.

Sincerely,


574 Garrett Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
619-849-9364

Sunday, November 11, 2007

Boyd Graves to U.S. Attorny General Mukasey, "U.S. Documents Prove U.S. Origin of AIDS"

Via mail, fax, email



November 10, 2007




The Honorable Michael Mukasey
Attorney General
United States of America
Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue
Washington, D.C. 20530-0001



Re:
Case No. 07 cv 0453
Graves v. United States
Southern District of California
(U.S. documents PROVE U.S. ORIGIN of AIDS)



Dear Mr. Attorney General:

I write today to seek a response regarding an ongoing case before the federal government. On May 17, 2007, Attorney General Gonzales received certified mail of the federal complaint, yet the Southern District of California dismissed the case for failure to serve (without prejudice) July 25, 2007.

Upon the filing of the new complaint, the Court “rejected” the complaint without comment. The whitewashing of the U.S. judicial system will never allow this specific case to be heard without your extraordinary intervention.

However, all across the country and the world, this case is being heard. Mr. Attorney General, today, over four million people have the U.S. document evidence proof of the laboratory birth of HIV/AIDS. See, www.boydgraves.com/flowchart/

The Justice Department can no longer have it both ways. There is a substantial basis in U.S. law and fact for the allegation and the conclusion the United States made AIDS.

Chief amongst the evidence:
1. the 1971 blueprint of the program.
The 1971 “research logic” flowchart of the U.S. Special Virus program
is first located at page 61 of progress report #8 (1971). The preceding sixty pages answer every question as to the “purpose”, “desire” and “intent” of the United States to make a “candidate human virus”. Any review of the U.S. Special Virus program and its fifteen progress reports will solve and end HIV/AIDS. Specifically, according to the 1972 report, the United States began testing the AIDS vaccine in 1972.

2. the 1997 CURE for AIDS
Any review of the U.S. Special Virus program will further prove the program is based on a “mouse model” and that a CURE for AIDS was developed in the laboratory mice. See, U.S. patent# 5676977.

3. U.S. House Resolution 15090
The page 129 testimony proves beyond a shadow of a doubt the United States has subrogated the U.S. Constitution. The early files are located in the National Research Council of the National Academy of Sciences. This Congressional funding of AIDS development is consistent with Foreign Policy Statement-21 (“FPS-21”), February 1948. It is also consistent with the 1946 Appropriations, See, “Better” Than the Bomb, Time Magazine, June 3, 1946.

4. U.S. Public Law 91-213
On March 16, 1970, President Nixon handed out pens as he signed the development of HIV/AIDS into law. Even before 15090, Fort Detrick’s April 4 -5 , 1969 conference, “Entry and Control of Foreign Nucleic Acid” led the way. These conference papers will also show the complete criminal culpability of our government to make a silent weapon for a quiet war contrary to the United States Constitution and every world governing authority regarding genocide, weapons of mass destruction and human life. Nixon was clairvoyant, there ‘WERE explosive deaths in the last third of the 20th Century.

5. NSSM-200
At the 1974 World Population Conference in Bucharest, Romania, the African leaders ‘balked’ at the idea of the “introduction” of AIDS (only) in Africa and only to Blacks. The United States agreed to give it to White people here. The United States recruited 1086 White, promiscuous homosexuals and gave them AIDS (the U.S. Special Virus) in batch #751 of Merck’s experimental hepatitis b vaccine. It is alleged the U.S. Department of Justice is illegally withholding this specific information.

6. Nixon’s July 18, 1969 Secret Memo on Overpopulation
This Memo speaks for all the good, innocent citizens who are dead who believed in our Constitution.

7. The sheep (visna) etiology of AIDS
ACCORDING TO THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, HIV/AIDS EVOLVED FROM AN “ICELANDIC” SHEEP DISEASE. See, Science, VOL 227, pp. 173 – 7, January 1985. See also, PROC NAS VOL 83, pp. 4007 – 11, June 1986, PROC NAS Vol 92, pp. 3283 – 3287, April 11, 1995. The Icelandic sheep sequences defy explanation in the genome of HIV/AIDS for a number of reasons. Most noticeable however is the narrative associated from the United States progress reports. On page 39 of progress report #8 (1971), the United States concedes that visna had not yet been associated with human disease. However, on July 18 1983 Dr. Matthew Gonda informed the U.S. AIDS Task Force that HIV/AIDS had evolved from visna. When and how did visna “cross species” between 1971 and 1983 so as to become the ‘etiological agent’ of HIV/AIDS? The issue of reparations revolves around the visna in my blood. A simple oral swab for a human test for visna will determine the reparations issue. If I test affirmative for visna. I should be repaired.

8. The missing progress reports
Dr. Alan Rabson was a member of the “Developmental Committee” of the U.S. Special Virus program and as Deputy Director of the National Cancer Institute, he has removed progress reports #’s 14 and 15 of the U.S. Special Virus program from the NCI archives. Dr. Rabson has been maintained in his position solely to allow the U.S. Special Virus program to fester. His actions are in clear violation of U.S. law.

Mr. Attorney General, we believe there is no more important an issue than one that seeks to buttress the Constitution. We write today to strengthen the security of our homeland, the United States of America, by requesting an investigation into the U.S. Special Virus program (1962 – 1978), its 1971 flowchart and fifteen progress reports, as well as the ten-year on the shelf CURE for AIDS, U.S. patent#5676977. See, www.uspto.gov .

How long before any apology? Not just to us, but to all the others in the world.

Respectfully submitted,



Boyd Ed Graves, J.D.
Chula Vista, CA 91910
www.boydgraves.com

Tuesday, October 2, 2007

AIDS activist to refile AIDS origin lawsuit

SAN DIEGO - International AIDS Activist, Boyd Ed Graves, J.D. will re-file the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the United States for “full disclosure” of the formerly secret U.S. Special Virus Program (1962 – 1978). According to medical experts, any review of this formerly secret federal virus development program will solve and end HIV/AIDS.


“The annual progress reports of this federal program (some fifteen) had lain dormant for some thirty years until the people began inquiring,” Graves said. “Then Dr. Alan Rabson removed progress reports #14 and progress report #15, representing the years 1977 & 1978.”


“The law requires Dr. Rabson to return all of the confiscated progress reports to the archives. The United States' Constitution says I have a right to life, this federal program proves I do not,” Graves said.

“We continue to seek accountability of the U.S. Special Virus program. Thus far to no avail in any part of our trilateral government. To date over four million people now possess knowledge of the 1971 blueprint of the federal program to make HIV/AIDS.” See also: www.boydgraves.com/flowchart/.

The case was dismissed by Federal Judge Larry A. Burns of the Southern District of California earlier this summer when Graves failed to serve the U.S. Attorney General. However, the record reveals then acting U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales indeed received notice of the lawsuit in May 2007, via certified mail and took no action of his own initiative.

No one in this U.S. government has downloaded the 1971 flowchart nor does any U.S. official have anything to say about U.S. House Resolution 15090, according to Graves. There is a substantial basis in U.S. law and fact for the allegation and the conclusion that the United States intentionally made HIV/AIDS with the purpose for use as a population control weapon; a quiet and silent holocaust of people of color, in the name of future White Americas. Graves cites U.S. Public Law 91-213, signed by then President Richard Nixon March 16, 1970.

“Know the truth about HIV/AIDS and the U.S. Special Virus program,” Graves said. “Then stand up and do something about it!”

####

Tuesday, September 25, 2007

U.S. Govt. silent on pre-AIDS 'Special Virus' flow chart, program

The Special Virus Cancer Program (1962-1977)

Conveniently forgotten by scientists and medical journalists was the fact that surgeons had been transplanting chimpanzee parts into human beings for decades. When Keith Reemtsma died in June 2000, at age 74, he was hailed as a pioneer in cross-species organ transplants (now known as xenotransplantation). By 1964 he had already placed six chimpanzee kidneys into six patients. All his patients died, but eventually Reemtsma succeeded in many successful human-to-human organ transplants.

Much more likely to have spread animal viruses to human beings is the largely forgotten Special Virus Cancer Program (SVCP). This research program was responsible for the development, the seeding, and the deployment of various animal viruses, which were capable of producing cancer and immune system damage when transferred between animal species and into human cells and tissue.
The SVCP began in 1964 as a government-funded program of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) in Bethesda, Maryland. Originally designed to study leukemia and lymphoma forms of cancer, the program was soon enlarged to study all forms of cancer.

The SVCP marshalled many of the nation's finest virologists, biochemists, immunologists, molecular biologists, and epidemiologists, at the most prestigious institutions in a coordinated attempt to assess the role of viruses in causing human cancer. Many of the top AIDS scientists, including Dr. Robert Gallo (the co-discoverer of HIV), Myron (Max) Essex (of "cat AIDS" fame), and Peter Duesberg (who claims HIV is not the cause of AIDS), were connected with the Program.

The scope of the program was international and included scientists from Japan, Sweden, Italy, the Netherlands, Israel, and even Uganda, Africa. A main mission of the SVCP was to collect various human and animal cancers from around the world and to grow large amounts of cancer-causing viruses. In the process, many animal viruses were adapted to human cells. These cultured viruses would then be shipped to researchers throughout the world.

An annual report of the accomplishments of the SVCP was published by the NCI. The 1971 SVCR report indicates a mouse leukemia virus had been adapted to grow in human cells. A "hybrid virus" - a mixture of a mouse sarcoma and a cat (feline) leukemia virus - was engineered and grown in cat cells. Chicken and feline retroviruses produced cancer in monkeys. Mouse-cat virus hybrids and feline leukemia virus were adapted to human cells in tissue culture. Thus, "species jumping" was a common occurrence in these experiments.

Biological Warfare, Primate Research and the SVCP

Also joining forces with the SVCP at the NCI were the miltary's biological warfare researchers. On October 18, 1971, President Richard Nixon announced that the army's biowarfare laboratories at nearby Fort Detrick, Maryland, would be converted to research on the cause, prevention, and treatment of cancer. As part of Nixon's so-called War on Cancer, the military biowarfare unit was retitled the new Frederick Cancer Research Center. Litton Bionetics was named as the military's prime contractor for this project.

The 1971 annual report noted that one of the primary tasks of the now jointly connected National Cancer Institute-Frederick Cancer Research Center was "the large scale production of oncogenic (cancer-causing) and suspected oncogenic viruses to meet research needs on a continuing basis." Special attention was given to primate viruses (the alleged African source of HIV) and "the successful propagation of significant amounts of human candidate viruses."
Candidate viruses were animal or human viruses that might be capable of intiating human cancers. And primate cancer-causing viruses were adapted to 'normal' human cells.

A steady supply of research animals (monkeys, chimpanzees, mice, and cats) was necessary, which resulted in the establishment of breeding colonies for the SVCP. Healthy animals were shipped in from various parts of the world for breeding purposes and experimentation; and virus-infected animals were shipped out again to various labs.

By 1971, a total of 2,274 primates had been inoculated at Bionetics Research Laboratories, under contract to Fort Detrick. Over 1000 of these monkeys had already died or had been transferred to other primate centers. (Some animals were eventually released back into the wild). By this time, experimenters had spread lymphoma-producing viruses into several species of monkeys, and had also isolated a monkey virus (Herpesvirus saimiri) that would have a close genetic relationship to a new Kaposi's sarcoma virus that produced the "gay cancer" of AIDS a few years later.

In order to prime primates and other research animals to acquire cancer, their immune system was deliberately suppressed by drugs, radiation, or cancer-causing chemicals or substances. The thymus gland and/or the spleen was removed, and viruses were injected into newborn animals or into the womb of pregnant animals. Some animals were also injected with malaria to keep them chronically sick and immunodepressed.

Primates (especially newborn and baby chimpanzees) were the most favored lab animals because they were most similar biochemically and immunologically to human beings, and because there would be no official testing of these lab viruses on humans. An irradiated rhesus monkey colony supplied animals for transplantation experiments.

Robert Gallo was a project officer of a primate study contracted by Bionetics that pumped cancerous human tissue, as well as a variety of chicken and monkeys viruses into newborn macaques (a small species of monkey). This 1971 SVCP report (NIH-71-2025) declared: "Inasmuch as tests for the biological activity of candidate human viruses will not be tested in the human species, it is imperative that another system be developed for these determinations and, subsequently for the evaluation of vaccines or other measure of control. The close phylogenetic relationship of the lower primates of man justifies utilization of these animals for these purposes."

Researchers at Bionetics evaluated the long-term cancer effects of injecting human and animal cancer material into various species of monkeys. Newborn monkeys, irradiated monkeys, and monkeys primed with cancer-causing chemicals, were injected with blood ("using multiple sites and volumes as large as possible") taken from various forms of human leukemia. In other studies, tissue cultures infected with various animal viruses were inoculated into primates. Many kinds of human cancer tissue were injected into the animals. How many "new" and "emerging" viruses were created and adapted by the SVCP is not known. And it is unlikely that complete records of this animal cancer virus experimentation will ever be examined.

Cats were also bred for leukemia and sarcoma cancer studies. An inbred germfree colony of mice was established. Mouse cancer viruses were manipulated to produce resistant and non-resistant strains. These adapted viruses would be employed in the 1980s in human gene replacement experiments. Such experiments utilized a weakened strain of the mouse leukemia virus to infect and "taxi-in" the missing genes to genetically-defective human cells.

The End of the SVCP and the Birth of AIDS

By 1977 the SVCP came to a inglorious end. According to Gallo, "Scientifically, the problem was that no one could supply clear evidence of any kind of human tumor virus, not even a DNA virus, and most researchers refused to concede that viruses played any role in human cancers. Politically, the Virus Cancer Program was vulnerable because it attracted a great deal of money and attention and had failed to produce dramatic, visible results."

Despite all this, the SCVP was the birthplace of genetic engineering, molecular biology, and the human genome project. More than any other program it built up the field of animal retrovirology, which led to the vital understanding of cancer and immunosuppressive retroviruses in humans. Like manna from heaven, AIDS in gays put the virologists back in business. And HIV, a cancer-causing and immunosuppressive retrovirus, would make Robert Gallo the most famous scientist in the world.

Few people understand clearly that AIDS is a new form of cancer, and this aspect of AIDS has not been publicized for obvious reasons. Physicians have always told their patients that cancer is not contagious or sexually transmitted. Virologists wanted AIDS and "gay cancer" to be a new disease because HIV was supposedly brand new. It was easier to blame gays for initiating this new disease with their sexual lifestyle than it was to point the finger at scientists. And if AIDS was connected to animal cancer research, some people might wonder if the new disease had anything to do with all those species jumping experiments in the 1970s. Making people understand that AIDS is cancer would only confuse them.

And so, instead of looking for the source of HIV in the thousands of animal cancer experiments performed througout the world, the virologists insisted on looking for the source of the virus in primates in the African rainforest.

The Pre-AIDS Gay Hepatitis B Experiments (1978-1981)


As the SVCP was winding down, thousands of gay men were signing up as guinea pigs for government-sponsored hepatitis B vaccine experiments in New York, Los Angeles, and San Francisco. In a few years these cities would become the epicenters for "gay-related immune deficiency syndrome, " later known as AIDS.

Could virus-contaminated vaccines lie at the root of AIDS? In the early 1970s the hepatitis B vaccine was developed in chimpanzees, now widely accepted as the animal from which HIV supposedly evolved. To this day, some people are fearful about taking the hepatitis B vaccine because of its original connection to gay men and AIDS; and older physicians remember the original experimental hepatitis vaccine was made from the pooled blood serum of hepatitis-infected homosexuals.

Was HIV "introduced" into gays during these vaccine trials when thousands of homosexuals were injected in New York beginning in 1978, and in the West Coast cities in 1980-1981?

AIDS first erupted in gays living in New York City in 1979 a few months after the experiment began in Manhattan. The astounding and statistically significant fact is that 20% of the gay men who volunteered for the hepatitis B experiment in New York were discovered to be HIV-positive in 1980 (a year before AIDS became "official" in 1981). This would mean that Manhattan men had the highest incidence of HIV anywhere in the world, including Africa, the supposed birthplace of HIV and AIDS. The fact is that definite, proven cases of AIDS in Africa would not appear until 1982.

Some researchers are convinced that these vaccine experiments served as the vehicle through which HIV was "introduced" into the gay population in America. Nevertheless, AIDS scientists have downplayed any connection of AIDS with the vaccine. My own extensive research into the hepatitis B experiments is presented in AIDS and the Doctors of Death: An Inquiry into the Origin of the AIDS Epidemic, published in 1988. Also included in this book is evidence suggesting "patient
Zero" story of 1987, which claimed a promiscuous gay Canadian airline steward brought AIDS to America. Montagnier "is doubtful that the American epidemic could have developed from a single patient."

Montagnier admits that he stands apart from Robert Gallo on many matters. In a mind-blowing statement he declares "Gallo was not a medical doctor, but rather a biochemist by training. His limited experience with viruses at the time perhaps explains his misinterpretations and the contaminations that occurred in his laboratory." ( Gallo has always declared himself as a physician. If he is not, then we certainly do have a conspiracy problem on our hands.)

What is obvious from their authored books is that while the continent of Africa dies, these two top scientists in AIDS research continue their vendetta in print, and continue to promote their own pet theories on the origin of HIV and AIDS to an adoring scientific community.


"Gay and Straight" Strains of HIV and Sexual Preference

It is common knowledge that AIDS is a heterosexual disease in Africa, and that AIDS started exclusively as a gay disease in the United States. Although the public was told early on that "no one is immune from AIDS", the fact remains that even now (20 years after the first AIDS cases) 80% of the new AIDS cases in America are gay men, IV drug addicts, and their sexual partners. Why is this? Certainly HIV does not discriminate between sexual preference and race! Or does it?

In the mid-1990s molecular biologists identified at least 8 different subtypes (or "clades" or "strains") of HIV that were infecting various people around the world. Remarkably, it turns out that the "B" strain is the predominant strain infecting gays in the U.S. Even more remarkable is that this strain of HIV has an "affinity" to infect rectal tissue, thus explaining why gays are more likely to get AIDS than straights. In contrast, the HIV strains common in Africa have an affinity for vaginal and cervical cells, as well as for cells of the foreskin of the penis. Thus, HIV is more likely to infect heterosexuals in Africa.

How do we know this? Max Essex (a Harvard veterinarian who performed pre-AIDS experiments transferring feline leukemia virus between cat populations) tested subtype E strains of HIV from Thailand. He discovered that this Asian strain readily infected women's genital cells of the vagina and cervix. But the "gay" B strain of HIV did not infect them as easily.

AIDS experts tell us American AIDS came from Africa, but the strain of HIV prevalent in gay men is almost never seen in Africa! How is this possible? Were strains of HIV engineered to adapt easily to cells likely to be infected in gay sex? Or adapted to genital cells involved in vaginal sex?

We know scientists in the SVCP were able to adapt certain retroviruses to infect specific kinds of cells. As early as 1970 biowarfare scientists were learning to design certain infectious agents (particularly viruses) that would attack the cells of certain racial groups.
More recently, in 1997, Stephen O'Brien and Michael Dean of the Laboratory of Genomic Diversity at the National Cancer Institute have shown that one out of ten white people have AIDS-resistant genes, whereas blacks in Africa have none. Is this simply another peculiarity of a virus that jumped species in the African bush? Or is HIV a designer virus, specifically adapted in its subtypes to infect certain racial groups and gay people?

When AIDS appeared in 1981, health officials assured the "general public" that there was nothing to fear. "AIDS is a gay disease" was the phrase repeated over and over again in a media blitz. As late as 1987, Robert Gallo told Playboy reporter David Black, "I personally don't know of a single case (in America) of a man getting the (AIDS) virus from a woman through heterosexual intercourse."

In Africa, where AIDS affects men and women in equal numbers, Gallo's explanation to Black was: "It happens, but that may be due to differences in sexual practices, more promiscuity or to a greater incidence of venereal disease." Gallo give Playboy his reassurance of the future of heterosexual AIDS in America: "AIDS will never become an overwhelming danger to the general public."


Solving the Mystery of the Origin of AIDS

The pre-AIDS species jumping experiments of the Special Virus Cancer Program (SVCP) have been largely expunged from the history of HIV and AIDS. The viral contamination problems inherent in viral research have also been downplayed. As a result, the origin of HIV and AIDS has been distorted and obscured.

A serious examination of the SVCP provides "missing links" to the possible laboratory origin of HIV. The ability of SVCP scientists to produce "new" diseases with cancer-causing animal viruses is a matter of record. The ability of animal viruses to easily contaminate laboratory experiments and vaccine manufacture is also well known. All these factors make the man-made theory of AIDS rational and compelling.


| DOWNLOAD | The 1971 U.S. Special Virus Research Logic Flow Chart

Friday, August 17, 2007

A Solution to the AIDS Crisis

August 16, 2007

Nancy Pelosi, Speaker
House of Representatives
United States Congress
Washington, D.C. 20530

Re: A Solution to the AIDS Crisis

Dear Madam Speaker:

First let me say thank you for allowing your staff to contact me regarding the issue of the ORIGIN, VACCINE and CURE for HIV/AIDS.

Any review of the U.S. Special Virus (Cancer) program (1962 – 1978) will solve HIV/AIDS. According to page 2 of the 1971 progress report (#8), the purpose of the U.S. Special Virus program was to see if animal viruses (visna) could grow in certain human host cells. The 1971 progress report confirms visna had not yet been associated with human disease. See page 39.

At the July 18, 1983 AIDS Task Force meeting, Dr. Matthew A. Gonda confirmed that visna (not SIV) was the “etiological agent” of HIV/AIDS. Dr. Gonda then co-authored a science paper with Dr. Robert Gallo to further show the evolutionary relationship between HIV/AIDS and visna. See, Science, Vol 227, pp. 173 – 7, January, 1985.

In 1986, the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) reached the same conclusion. See, PROC NAS Vol 83, pp. 4007 – 11, June 1986. Further, in 1995, the NAS concluded that (because of the visna origin of HIV/AIDS), sheep were the best animal model for the testing of new HIV/AIDS inhibitors. See, PROC NAS Vol 92, pp. 3283 – 87, April 1995.

The sheep sequences in HIV/AIDS alone prove HIV/AIDS is the product of recombinant genetics. Otherwise, the United States would be able to cite a reference to the “cross species transfer” of visna into the human genome. There is none.


The visna virus has been nurtured over the past 75 years for the purposes of accomplishing a hidden eugenics plan of depopulation of people of color. The fifteen progress reports of the U.S. Special Virus program are filled with experiments and contracts on visna.

When this issue was previously presented to the government, prior to 9-11, the government found it convenient to postpone their report until June 2002. However, the report (below) was fraught with falsities for obvious reasons. The government did not respond to the people’s “Request for Factual Correction” (below).

Today, more than four million people have the 1971 flowchart blueprint of the Special Virus program. It proves that HIV/AIDS was designed and intended to be afflicted on the people. See, www.boydgraves.com/flowchart/
.
However, Phase IV-A holds the keys to some of the early work done to control and inhibit HIV/AIDS, including a 1972 VACCINE for HIV/AIDS.
As we have also pointed out, the government patented the CURE for AIDS in 1997. See , U.S. patent#5676977, www.uspto.gov .

U.S. House Resolution 15090, page 129 proves the U.S. Congress has consistently funded the continual development of HIV/AIDS in contradiction to the U.S. Constitution.

Madam Speaker, do I have an inalienable right to life or not?

Respectfully submitted,

Boyd Ed Graves, J.D.
574 Garrett Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
619-849-9364

Friday, July 20, 2007

U.S. Attorney General Gonzales to answer AIDS origin lawsuit

SAN DIEGO - Federal Court Judge Larry Burns has issued an Order giving AIDS activist Boyd Ed Graves until July 27, 2007 to 'show cause' as to why his complaint should not be dismissed. At issue is Graves’ failure to ‘summon’ the United States Attorney General, Alberto Gonzales.


“When I filed the case on March 12, 2007 there was a waiver of summons form that I was unfamiliar with,” Graves said. Consequently Gonzales never received a ‘summons’ for the federal lawsuit.


However on May 12, 2007 Graves sent Attorney General Gonzales the federal lawsuit via certified mail, return receipt requested. On May 15, 2007 Attorney General Gonzales received the federal lawsuit as the return receipt reflects.


Graves will submit the proof of service by the Court’s identified deadline and will await an answer from the U.S. Attorney General.


The Attorney General will not be able to explain why Dr. Alan Rabson, Deputy Director National Cancer Institute (NCI) has removed government documents form the archives of the NCI,” Graves said.


However to many observers familiar with Graves' case, this lawsuit will show the true conspiratorial nature of the United States to make HIV/AIDS and then rely on an abridged press and twisted judicial process to further hide the truth of the laboratory birth of HIV/AIDS, inside the formerly secret U.S. Special Virus Program (1962-1978).



Anyone who reviews the docket will see the African American Federal Judge Nathaniel Jones, had recused himself from Graves’ lawsuit on March 22, 2007 without explanation.


Dr. Boyd Ed Graves has developed a global following of his 15 years of HIV/AIDS ORIGIN research and his nine years of legal activism to compel the United States to admit the truths identified in the government documents.


If we review the fifteen progress reports of the U.S. Special Virus program (1962 – 1978), we will solve and end HIV/AIDS. It is appalling we find all three level of government assisting the process to subrogate the U.S. Constitution. The U.S. Special Virus program PROVES, I have never had a right to life.”

####




Tuesday, June 5, 2007

Freedom is a constant struggle

Dr. Graves to U.S. Ambassador Carmen Martinez - May 28, 2007

Dear Ambassador Martinez,


I write today to follow your Freedom Day remarks. I am here in Zambia because I too believe in the expressed political values that you espouse of freedom relative to press and government accountability. With respect to this issue of the Origin of AIDS, the President has made specific remarks, and they are not true.

In the President’s 2003 State of the Union Address, he informed the world that AIDS was a plague of nature’. In subsequent comments, the President said that his comments had been approved by the Central Intelligence Agency.

The historical development of HIV/AIDS is best explained through any review of CIA Project NAOMI. This CIA program appears to be the underpinnings of the implementation of HIV/AIDS, following the 1946 confirmation of the development of HIV/AIDS, as in evidenced in the May 1946 Appropriations hearing of the Uned States Congress.

Going further, as we must, we find a sleugh of U.S. Congressional documentation, unquestionable, as to there purpose and intent. In this regard, it is the 1969 Pentagon request for a ‘synthetic biological agent’ that could deplete the immune system’ that has stood and will stand as the single most compelling piece of evidence against our government for all time.

U.S. House Resolution 15090, page 129 and its global read, is the essence of the principles of freedom of which you speak Page 129 is clear and plain and all can understand, in every language. The conclusion is real and frightening, but true. HIV/AIDS is the synthetic agent sought by our government since, at least, the 1843 discovery of ‘mycoplasmas’. But for the U.S. Special Virus program (1962 – 1978), science and medicine can not explain the sheep recombinant sequences in the genome of HIV/AIDS.

Dr. Robert Gallo is guilty, but not as charged. By his own admission, he was a “Project Officer” for the U.S. Special Virus program. See, page 104, progress report #8 (1971), U.S. Special Virus program (1962 -1978). Dr. Gallo congratulated me for confirming page 157 of his autobiography.

In addition, the U.S. CURE for AIDS was patented by Dr. Gallo’s medical school classmate, Rabbi Dr. Marvin Antelman. In 1997, our government issued Rabbi Antelman a patent for a treatment for curing AIDS. See, U.S. patent #5676977. I am here in Lusaka to begin to end the U.S. AIDS virus. We have within our reach a vision of a world once again free of HIV/AIDS. I trust, hope and pray you genuinely share in this regard.

Freedom’s slave,



Boyd Ed Graves, J.D.
www.boydgraves.com