Wednesday, June 13, 2007
Hope in clinical trials of AIDS Cure
June 12, 2007
Senator Russell Feingold,
Chairman Subcommittee on Africa
Re: Hope in clinical trials of AIDS Cure
Dear Chairman Feingold:
I write today to report on my recent trip to Africa. At the invitation of a Zambian businessman, I traveled to Lusaka last month for the purposes of convincing the Zambian government to begin the ‘clinical trials’ of the U.S. patented CURE for AIDS, U.S. patent number 5676977 (“TETRASIL”). Go to www.uspto.gov.
According to the U.S. patent office, Tetrasil is a one-time infusion for curing AIDS. As a recipient of the Tetrasil myself, I can personally attest to the many benefits that I have garnered over the past six years.
As Chairman of the African Committee I feel compelled to alert you of the African desire to be free of the U.S. AIDS virus. In this regard, your Committee has never addressed the federal virus development program that preceded HIV/AIDS. Although the U.S. development of HIV/AIDS permeates the entire 20th Century, the formal program began in 1962. The U.S. Special Virus program produced some fifteen yearly progress reports of every experiment and contract of the development of HIV/AIDS between 1962 and 1978.
It is incumbent upon your Committee to review and investigate this federal program. This is the same request we made of our government in 2000. Dr. Victoria Cargill, NIH’s Medical Officer for HIV/AIDS Research located the blueprint ( a 1971 flowchart) of the development of HIV/AIDS on May 15, 2000. Dr. Cargill forwarded the information to Dr. Alan S. Rabson, Deputy Director of the National Cancer Institute (NCI).
Dr. Rabson thwarted any further investigation of the U.S. Special Virus program because he is listed as a member of the “Developmental Segment” (of HIV/AIDS) in 1971. See, page 12, progress report #8 (1971), U.S. Special Virus program (1962 – 1978).
It is clear without oversight from this Committee and your leadership, there will always remain, even perhaps, purposefully so, some doubt that a monkey and an African could have been a ‘natural’ beginning to the greatest calamity in human history.
In light of the fifteen progress reports of this federal program, we are certain the African governments will require ‘explanation’ for the HIV/AIDS weapon. Any cursory review of the U.S. Pentagon’s sworn testimony of June 9, 1969 will definitively prove HIV/AIDS is the ‘synthetic biological agent’ sought by the U.S. Pentagon and paid for by the U.S. Congress.
I can assure the African governments have read page 129 of U.S. House Resolution 15090. Our President was factually incorrect when he declared in his 2003 State of the Union Address that HIV/AIDS was a plague of nature.
Mr. Chairman, if HIV/AIDS is a plague of nature, then where is the Pentagon’s synthetic agent, that was funded, that appears to do EXACTLY what HIV/AIDS does?
Respectfully,
Boyd Ed Graves, J.D.
Thursday, June 7, 2007
Tuesday, June 5, 2007
Voice of America violates U.S. Law (May 29, 2007)
May 29, 2007
To the Voice of America
Re: Violation of U.S. Public Law 94-350;
Your Zambia AIDS CURE broadcast
To Whom it may concern:
The May 27 Internet stream of the Zambian AIDS CURE contains a heading of “Zamiba (sp) Fake Drugs”. The VOA has violated its charter and mission pursuant to U.S. law. http://www.voanews.com/mediaassets/english/2007_05/Audio/mp3/Zamiba_Fake_Drugs.mp3
The VOA has violated U.S. Public law 94-350 in that the broadcast has clearly attempted to discredit the U.S. patented CURE for AIDS, “Tetrasil” as a “fake”. The Voice of America can not replace the modality of the clinical trials, however with its purposefully false pronouncement, the VOA has illegally sought to sway public opinion away from the U.S. patented CURE for AIDS.
The VOA violates its charter and the American people and the 100 million people of the world who depend on it for initial “objectivity”, when it refers to a U.S. patented product as ‘fake’ without any conclusionary evidence.
In this particular complaint, the VOA chose to label Tetrasil as fake, although the clinical trials are just getting underway and Zambian officials have not come to that same conclusion, and in essence hold out for the results of the trials. The VOA does not have a right to take away the hope of the people by intentionally false broadcasts.
Here, by purpose and intent, the VOA has sought to supercede the comprehensive clinical trial process to draw an inaccurate portrayal of a CURE for AIDS, that has already gone through comprehensive testing and been proven. The VOA has intentionally made a clear and effective attempt to draw public attention and interest away from a grass roots process that is truth and people driven.
Tetrasil is not fake, it is cheap and effective, and as the patent shows, it is not a drug. I would appreciate a public retraction of your heading and your global attention on the trials.
Sincerely,
Boyd Ed Graves, J.D.
www.boydgraves.com
To the Voice of America
Re: Violation of U.S. Public Law 94-350;
Your Zambia AIDS CURE broadcast
To Whom it may concern:
The May 27 Internet stream of the Zambian AIDS CURE contains a heading of “Zamiba (sp) Fake Drugs”. The VOA has violated its charter and mission pursuant to U.S. law. http://www.voanews.com/mediaassets/english/2007_05/Audio/mp3/Zamiba_Fake_Drugs.mp3
The VOA has violated U.S. Public law 94-350 in that the broadcast has clearly attempted to discredit the U.S. patented CURE for AIDS, “Tetrasil” as a “fake”. The Voice of America can not replace the modality of the clinical trials, however with its purposefully false pronouncement, the VOA has illegally sought to sway public opinion away from the U.S. patented CURE for AIDS.
The VOA violates its charter and the American people and the 100 million people of the world who depend on it for initial “objectivity”, when it refers to a U.S. patented product as ‘fake’ without any conclusionary evidence.
In this particular complaint, the VOA chose to label Tetrasil as fake, although the clinical trials are just getting underway and Zambian officials have not come to that same conclusion, and in essence hold out for the results of the trials. The VOA does not have a right to take away the hope of the people by intentionally false broadcasts.
Here, by purpose and intent, the VOA has sought to supercede the comprehensive clinical trial process to draw an inaccurate portrayal of a CURE for AIDS, that has already gone through comprehensive testing and been proven. The VOA has intentionally made a clear and effective attempt to draw public attention and interest away from a grass roots process that is truth and people driven.
Tetrasil is not fake, it is cheap and effective, and as the patent shows, it is not a drug. I would appreciate a public retraction of your heading and your global attention on the trials.
Sincerely,
Boyd Ed Graves, J.D.
www.boydgraves.com
Freedom is a constant struggle
Dr. Graves to U.S. Ambassador Carmen Martinez - May 28, 2007
Dear Ambassador Martinez,
I write today to follow your Freedom Day remarks. I am here in Zambia because I too believe in the expressed political values that you espouse of freedom relative to press and government accountability. With respect to this issue of the Origin of AIDS, the President has made specific remarks, and they are not true.
In the President’s 2003 State of the Union Address, he informed the world that AIDS was a plague of nature’. In subsequent comments, the President said that his comments had been approved by the Central Intelligence Agency.
The historical development of HIV/AIDS is best explained through any review of CIA Project NAOMI. This CIA program appears to be the underpinnings of the implementation of HIV/AIDS, following the 1946 confirmation of the development of HIV/AIDS, as in evidenced in the May 1946 Appropriations hearing of the Uned States Congress.
Going further, as we must, we find a sleugh of U.S. Congressional documentation, unquestionable, as to there purpose and intent. In this regard, it is the 1969 Pentagon request for a ‘synthetic biological agent’ that could deplete the immune system’ that has stood and will stand as the single most compelling piece of evidence against our government for all time.
U.S. House Resolution 15090, page 129 and its global read, is the essence of the principles of freedom of which you speak Page 129 is clear and plain and all can understand, in every language. The conclusion is real and frightening, but true. HIV/AIDS is the synthetic agent sought by our government since, at least, the 1843 discovery of ‘mycoplasmas’. But for the U.S. Special Virus program (1962 – 1978), science and medicine can not explain the sheep recombinant sequences in the genome of HIV/AIDS.
Dr. Robert Gallo is guilty, but not as charged. By his own admission, he was a “Project Officer” for the U.S. Special Virus program. See, page 104, progress report #8 (1971), U.S. Special Virus program (1962 -1978). Dr. Gallo congratulated me for confirming page 157 of his autobiography.
In addition, the U.S. CURE for AIDS was patented by Dr. Gallo’s medical school classmate, Rabbi Dr. Marvin Antelman. In 1997, our government issued Rabbi Antelman a patent for a treatment for curing AIDS. See, U.S. patent #5676977. I am here in Lusaka to begin to end the U.S. AIDS virus. We have within our reach a vision of a world once again free of HIV/AIDS. I trust, hope and pray you genuinely share in this regard.
Freedom’s slave,
Boyd Ed Graves, J.D.
www.boydgraves.com
Dear Ambassador Martinez,
I write today to follow your Freedom Day remarks. I am here in Zambia because I too believe in the expressed political values that you espouse of freedom relative to press and government accountability. With respect to this issue of the Origin of AIDS, the President has made specific remarks, and they are not true.
In the President’s 2003 State of the Union Address, he informed the world that AIDS was a plague of nature’. In subsequent comments, the President said that his comments had been approved by the Central Intelligence Agency.
The historical development of HIV/AIDS is best explained through any review of CIA Project NAOMI. This CIA program appears to be the underpinnings of the implementation of HIV/AIDS, following the 1946 confirmation of the development of HIV/AIDS, as in evidenced in the May 1946 Appropriations hearing of the Uned States Congress.
Going further, as we must, we find a sleugh of U.S. Congressional documentation, unquestionable, as to there purpose and intent. In this regard, it is the 1969 Pentagon request for a ‘synthetic biological agent’ that could deplete the immune system’ that has stood and will stand as the single most compelling piece of evidence against our government for all time.
U.S. House Resolution 15090, page 129 and its global read, is the essence of the principles of freedom of which you speak Page 129 is clear and plain and all can understand, in every language. The conclusion is real and frightening, but true. HIV/AIDS is the synthetic agent sought by our government since, at least, the 1843 discovery of ‘mycoplasmas’. But for the U.S. Special Virus program (1962 – 1978), science and medicine can not explain the sheep recombinant sequences in the genome of HIV/AIDS.
Dr. Robert Gallo is guilty, but not as charged. By his own admission, he was a “Project Officer” for the U.S. Special Virus program. See, page 104, progress report #8 (1971), U.S. Special Virus program (1962 -1978). Dr. Gallo congratulated me for confirming page 157 of his autobiography.
In addition, the U.S. CURE for AIDS was patented by Dr. Gallo’s medical school classmate, Rabbi Dr. Marvin Antelman. In 1997, our government issued Rabbi Antelman a patent for a treatment for curing AIDS. See, U.S. patent #5676977. I am here in Lusaka to begin to end the U.S. AIDS virus. We have within our reach a vision of a world once again free of HIV/AIDS. I trust, hope and pray you genuinely share in this regard.
Freedom’s slave,
Boyd Ed Graves, J.D.
www.boydgraves.com
Labels:
aids,
cure,
hiv,
politics,
special virus
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)